Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

FREE Shipping

Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

RRP: £99
Price: £9.9
£9.9 FREE Shipping

In stock

We accept the following payment methods


For example, when dictating a telephone number, the series of digits "1070" may be spoken as "one zero seven zero" or as "one oh seven oh", even though the letter "O" on the telephone keypad in fact corresponds to the digit 6. But progress on climate and energy policies to shift to newer, cleaner technologies has in some ways slowed in recent years, for example, with the ban on onshore wind farms. But unfortunately, the “net” in “net zero” is being used to green-wash weak climate targets, and could end up driving huge land grabs, particularly in the global South. Such projects demonstrate exciting possible applications for captured carbon, but there is no prospect they will have any measurable impact on reducing global warming. This is a handy activity that can be used in a range of ways, such as leaving it out in continuous provision and encouraging the children to sort the cards independently or use as a part of a group activity when learning about zero.

But as the years passed, the initial task of keeping us safe became increasingly harder given the continual increase in fossil fuel use. Consequently the only application of carbon capture in actual operation then – and now – is to use the trapped gas in enhanced oil recovery schemes. C in the near term, but then be brought down with a range of carbon dioxide removal by the end of the century. If we want to keep people safe then large and sustained cuts to carbon emissions need to happen now. There is tangential support for this in the use of "duck" as the name for a score of zero by a batsman in cricket, which name derives from the full name "the duck's egg" for that score.That said, most attention in the mid-1990s was focused on increasing energy efficiency and energy switching (such as the UK’s move from coal to gas) and the potential of nuclear energy to deliver large amounts of carbon-free electricity. By making such outlandish carbon neutrality claims, these corporations are not only misleading consumers and investors, they are opening themselves up to increasing legal and reputational liability.

Despite the wishful thinking of champions of carbon offsetting at COP28, the voluntary carbon market will only play a role in tackling the climate crisis with stricter standards and greater transparency. Apart from some notable exceptions, in public we quietly go about our work, apply for funding, publish papers and teach.Because without exploring these issues, we seem to have another set of unsolvable problems, without understanding what the next steps might be. Deployment of these technologies would have involved significant initial investment, but these upfront costs would have already begun to pay off in the form of lower bills as well as stimulating growth in industries such as building, car manufacture and renewables. These promised 'nature-based solutions' risk replicating the imperialist models which got us into this crisis in the first place – with countries in the Global South now acting as a carbon sink for pollution from the most industrialised nations.

You're probably familiar with the argument, made repeatedly by scientists, campaigners, and countries most vulnerable to climate breakdown, that a 2050 target is much too late. Bottlenecks, such as skills gaps and planning consents for infrastructure, should be anticipated and tackled early. More worryingly still, three-quarters of the corporations plan to offset or neutralise a significant portion of their emissions using carbon credits from forestry and other land use projects.This meant that discussions about policies were limited to those most convenient to politicians: incremental changes to legislation and taxes. C. It would have been a huge challenge, but the main task at that time would have been to simply stop the accelerating use of fossil fuels while fairly sharing out future emissions.

By 2050, it is widely accepted that corporations will need to have reduced their emissions by 90-95% compared with current levels. Just as important, by 2009 it was becoming increasingly clear that it would not be possible to make even the gradual reductions that policy makers demanded. For that reason and based on the findings of the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor, Carbon Market Watch has come up with a set of recommendations for governments and corporations.Mass tree planting, for bioenergy or as an attempt at offsetting, had been the latest attempt to stall cuts in fossil fuel use. In this analysis we look at the cost impacts of delays in these policies to household bills and the UK as a whole.

  • Fruugo ID: 258392218-563234582
  • EAN: 764486781913
  • Sold by: Fruugo

Delivery & Returns


Address: UK
All products: Visit Fruugo Shop